On this page
Quick picks for free website uptime monitors #
- Best hosted start: UptimeRobot with 50 free monitors.
- Best self-hosted option: Uptime Kuma for custom checks and notification choices.
- Best monitoring plus incident tools: Better Stack for a broader operational account.
- Best mixed free checks: StatusCake for uptime plus a small SSL, domain, and speed allowance.
- Best free check frequency: HetrixTools with one-minute checks.
- Best for a handful of low-stakes sites: DownNotifier for a simple email alert.
- Best for an existing IT-monitoring setup: Site24x7 with its dedicated free website-monitoring offer.
- Best small public status setup: Pulsetic with three free status pages.
Compare monitors, intervals, and alert channels #
| Tool | Best for | Platform | Free limits | Paid entry | Where checks run | Main strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UptimeRobot | Hosted URL checks | Web dashboard | 50 monitors, 5-minute interval | Solo $12/month annually or $13 monthly | Vendor locations | Large free monitor count |
| Uptime Kuma | Owner-run checks | Self-hosted web app | No vendor monitor cap | Software free; server costs separate | Your installation | Flexible checks and notifications |
| Better Stack | Operations account | Web dashboard | 10 monitors/heartbeats, 3-minute checks | $29/month annually or $34 monthly | Vendor locations | Monitoring plus incident tools |
| StatusCake | Several check types | Web dashboard | 10 uptime checks, 5 minutes | Paid Superior/Business | Vendor locations | Extra free SSL/domain/speed checks |
| HetrixTools | Frequent free checks | Web dashboard | 15 uptime monitors, 1 minute | $9.95/month or $99.95/year | 4 free locations | Faster free interval |
| DownNotifier | Small personal sites | Web dashboard/email | 5 websites, 10 minutes | Premium $14.95/year | Vendor service | Simple low-volume setup |
| Site24x7 | Small IT watchlist | Web dashboard | Linked offer: 5 websites, 1 minute | Paid monitoring plans | Up to 3 free locations | Frequent basic checks |
| Pulsetic | Small status pages | Web dashboard | 10 monitors, 5 minutes, 3 pages | Solo $9/month or $90/year | Vendor locations | Status-page allowance |
The interval is the space between scheduled checks, not a promise that every outage will be detected and delivered to your phone within that time. Short interruptions can fall between checks, and a notification channel can fail independently of the monitored site.
an easy hosted start with 50 monitors
UptimeRobot Free includes 50 monitors with five-minute checks, three months of data retention, and one basic hosted status page. That's enough room to watch several client sites or a collection of important URLs without running a monitoring application yourself.
I'd rank it first for an owner who needs a straightforward URL check and email alert. A normal website can use an HTTP(s) monitor; a more specific check can look for page content. The dashboard gives the owner a place to review incidents and response times without needing to maintain the monitoring server.
UptimeRobot reviews include a June 2026 report from a library service that found Free sufficient for its initial monitoring. I'd make the same narrow call for a first setup, then compare the alert workflow before expanding it.
The weakness is the free plan's speed and integration range. Five-minute checks can miss a brief failure, and its five included integrations don't cover every team's alert workflow. Decide how the alert will reach a person before assuming the free plan is enough.
Current terms allow commercial use. Older advice restricting Free to noncommercial projects is no longer the right rule. Solo costs $12/month billed annually, or $13 month-to-month; faster checks and additional features depend on the tier.
Pick it if you want many hosted URL checks with little setup. Skip it if a five-minute interval or the free notification choices are too limited for your response process.
monitoring on a server you control
Uptime Kuma is free, open-source software with a web dashboard. It supports HTTP, TCP, keyword, DNS, push, and other monitor types, plus many notification services. There is no vendor subscription limiting how many checks you create.
I'd choose it for a technically capable owner who wants to monitor both public URLs and services reachable from their own network. That can be valuable for a local application, internal endpoint, or server service that a public hosted monitor can't access directly.
The weakness is the location of the monitor itself. If it runs on the same server as the website, a whole-server failure can stop both the site and the checks. Put the monitor somewhere that can still observe the failure you care about. A machine at home can also lose its own internet connection and create a different blind spot.
The software is free under the MIT license, while hosting, updates, storage, and backup work belong to you. The project is active in 2026. Our UptimeRobot vs Uptime Kuma comparison covers the operational differences and upgrade details.
Pick it if you can run the application and need flexible checks. Skip it if nobody will maintain the monitor or its host can fail alongside the website.
a broader account for operational work
Better Stack's free plan combines uptime monitoring with allowances for related telemetry products. The uptime portion includes ten monitors and heartbeats, one status page, and email and Slack alerts. The uptime product and check-frequency documentation document three-minute free checks.
I'd choose it for a developer already thinking about incidents, logs, and application errors. One account can be easier to work with when a website outage needs investigation beyond the first alert. A heartbeat can also watch whether a scheduled job has checked in, which is a different task from loading a home page.
The catch is the ten-monitor allowance and the limits on the surrounding products. A free telemetry bundle doesn't mean unlimited log storage, recordings, or advanced routing. Start with the services that matter and check each enabled product's allowance.
Paid entry is listed at $29/month billed annually, or $34 month-to-month. I'd compare it with the team's incident process, especially if several people need to receive and own an alert. For one personal page, the broader account may be more system than you need.
Pick it if monitoring belongs beside other operational tools. Skip it if your whole requirement is a small list of URLs and an occasional email.
uptime with a few extra checks
StatusCake Free allows ten uptime monitors with five-minute intervals. It also includes one page-speed monitor, one domain monitor, and one SSL monitor, each with its own checking interval.
I'd choose it for a small site portfolio where remembering certificate and domain checks is part of the job. Uptime, expiry, and performance are related concerns but need different monitoring. A page can load while its certificate is approaching expiry, so a separate warning can prevent a later outage.
The limitation is the small allowance for those extras. One SSL monitor doesn't cover every certificate in a ten-site portfolio. The free page-speed check samples a page periodically. It can't show every visitor's experience.
Paid Superior and Business plans expand the counts and frequency. The official page varies currency by region, so use its current paid plan quote when budgeting. I'd compare the complete set of checks you need instead of choosing from the uptime count alone.
Pick it if a few extra expiry and speed checks make a small portfolio easier to watch. Skip it if every site needs those extras or you require frequent free uptime checks.
one-minute checks with an account condition
HetrixTools Free includes 15 uptime monitors and one-minute checks from four available locations. That's its strongest reason to make this list: a tighter free interval than most hosted alternatives here.
The catch is an account-maintenance rule. Free users must sign in at least once every 90 days. I'd put that reminder into the same calendar used to review monitoring, because a monitor that is installed and then ignored can become a poor safety net.
The service also covers status pages, maintenance mode, outage diagnostics, and expiry-related checks. Those features can help explain whether a failure was expected maintenance or something to investigate. SMS and phone alerts use credits, and multiple email recipients are a paid feature.
Professional costs $9.95/month or $99.95/year. It increases monitor counts and removes the free login condition. I'd choose the free tier for an owner who will actually review the account regularly, then assess paid service when the alert recipients or portfolio grow.
Pick it if one-minute free checks matter and you'll keep the account active. Skip it if you expect to leave the service untouched for long periods.
simple alerts for a few websites
DownNotifier Free watches five websites at ten-minute intervals, with email alerts. SMS requires credits. That is the slowest free interval in this shortlist, so I'd reserve it for low-stakes websites where simplicity is the main goal.
For a personal portfolio or a few small project pages, a plain alert can be enough to prompt a check. The owner doesn't necessarily need an incident-management account or a dashboard full of telemetry. The account questions explain the service's basic setup and plan behavior.
The weakness is the delay between checks. A ten-minute interval leaves more room for a short outage to pass unnoticed. I'd choose a faster option for a revenue-critical checkout or an application where someone is expected to react promptly.
Premium costs $14.95/year, covering ten websites and one-minute checks with more reporting and contacts. That makes the paid step worth comparing if the free interval is your only objection. More websites carry additional charges.
Pick it if five low-stakes sites and email alerts cover the job. Skip it if the website needs quick incident detection or a team response process.
frequent checks for a small IT watchlist
Site24x7's linked free offer lists five websites with one-minute checks from up to three locations. I'd consider it for a small URL watchlist, especially when the owner already knows the wider Site24x7 platform.
Other Site24x7 pages advertise a different free allowance. Check the offer attached to your signup before planning the portfolio; the numbers here follow the linked five-website offer.
The five-site cap is the practical weakness beside UptimeRobot's larger count. Several monitoring locations can help distinguish a regional failure, but they still don't prove that every customer's route to the website works. Match geographic coverage with the audience you serve.
Paid plans expand the monitoring job and alert options. Site24x7 is part of ManageEngine/Zoho, and its broader platform covers more than this free website offer. I'd choose the free product for basic URL watching, then compare the precise paid tier when other checks become necessary.
Pick it if five websites and the linked one-minute offer cover your setup. Skip it if you need a large free portfolio allowance or richer incident routing.
a small portfolio with public status pages
Pulsetic Free includes ten monitors, five-minute checks, three status pages, and three months of history. I'd choose it when a few public status pages are part of the requirement, rather than an afterthought attached to monitoring.
A small agency might want separate pages for different client services. That can make incident communication clearer than mixing every project into one public feed. The free pages use the service's arrangement; custom-domain and team features need a closer look at paid plans.
The weakness is the familiar free trade-off: a five-minute interval, a small monitor count, and limited alert and teammate options. A status page also needs a communication process. An automatic red indicator doesn't explain a cause or tell customers when you expect another update.
Solo costs $9/month or $90/year. Team and Organization expand the setup, with add-ons for some usage and alert features. I'd calculate the monitors, teammates, and notification channels together before choosing an upgrade.
Pick it if a small portfolio needs several hosted status pages. Skip it if your priority is the fastest free checks or a large shared response team.
How we chose #
We checked official allowances and documentation on October 8, 2026, with public discussions used to identify plan and operational friction. The list favors ongoing free services; Freshping is excluded because Freshworks closed it on March 6, 2026.
Choose the failure you need to detect #
An HTTP check asks whether a web endpoint responds. A keyword check can confirm expected page content. A heartbeat can watch a scheduled job that should report regularly. Start with the failure that would require action, then choose the monitor type.
Place monitoring outside the system it watches when whole-server failure matters. Agree who receives an alert and what they do next. Our UptimeRobot guide covers a basic website check, while UptimeRobot vs Uptime Kuma compares hosted and self-hosted operation.
FAQ #
Which free uptime monitor is best for a small website?
UptimeRobot is my starting choice for many hosted URL checks, while HetrixTools is stronger when one-minute free checks matter. For a technically capable owner, Uptime Kuma provides flexibility on their own server. The best choice depends on check frequency, alert delivery, and whether someone is willing to operate the monitoring application.
Can free monitoring guarantee that my site is always available?
No. Monitoring observes a service and sends alerts; it doesn't prevent downtime. Scheduled checks can miss short interruptions, and a checking location sees only its own route to the website. Use monitoring alongside backups, maintenance, and an incident response process, with someone responsible for investigating alerts when they arrive.
Is an HTTP monitor better than ping for a website?
Yes, for checking a web page. A server can answer ping while its web application is broken, and some hosts block ping while the website works. An HTTP monitor checks the web endpoint. Add a keyword check when the expected page content matters, such as detecting a generic error page returned with a successful status.
Can I monitor client websites on UptimeRobot Free?
Current UptimeRobot terms allow commercial use, so the free service can cover client websites within its plan allowance. The free interval, history, and alert integrations still apply. I'd agree who receives incidents and how the client is contacted before presenting a free monitor as part of an ongoing support service.
Should I host Uptime Kuma on the website's server?
I'd use a separate host when the goal is to detect a whole-server outage. A monitor on the same machine can disappear at the same moment as the website. Local placement can be fine for some internal checks, but decide which failures the monitor must still see before choosing where it runs.
Sources #
The linked vendor pricing and documentation establish plan counts and intervals. Freshping's closure notice explains why older shortlists that recommend it need updating.






















