Licensing is neither feasible nor effective for addressing AI risks

This essay argues that licensing is neither feasible nor effective for addressing AI risks and says non proliferation benefits incumbents.

normaltech.ai/p/licensing-is-neither-feasible-…
Licensing is neither feasible nor effective for addressing AI risks homepage screenshot

About Licensing is neither feasible nor effective for addressing AI risks

This essay by Sayash Kapoor and Arvind Narayanan, dated June 10, 2023, argues that licensing or non-proliferation of advanced AI models is neither feasible nor effective as a way to reduce AI risks. It examines enforcement, noting that licensing requirements can be ignored and that monitoring data centers would become harder as training costs fall. It also argues that non-proliferation would concentrate AI development among a small number of companies and could increase certain risks, such as shared security vulnerabilities and homogenized outcomes in areas like hiring.

The essay supports its points with specific examples, including a reported 44-fold drop in the cost of training an image recognition classifier between 2012 and 2019, and the authors' own estimate that the open-source Falcon model could be trained for less than USD 1 million. The excerpt available for this entry ends partway through its list of five AI risks, so the remaining arguments are not described here.

Key features

  • Argues that licensing AI model training is hard to enforce
  • Cites falling training costs for computer vision and language models
  • Examines how non-proliferation could concentrate AI development among few companies
  • Discusses AI risks including monoculture and outcome homogenization
  • Responds to the Future of Life Institute's proposed six-month training pause
Best for: Readers interested in AI policy, regulation, and the economics of AI model development.
Good for
  • Supports its arguments with specific cost and training examples
  • Addresses the proposal's enforcement and market concentration effects in separate sections
Watch out for
  • Presents the authors' own cost estimates, which are not independently verified in the text
  • The available excerpt ends before the full list of risks is covered

Licensing is neither feasible nor effective for addressing AI risks at a glance

Type
Publication
Platforms
Web
Language
English
Last checked
Oct 6, 2026 · Online when checked
Listed
Oct 5, 2026

Similar publications

Other listings in Tech News with the most in common.

Passion Times

passiontimes.hk

Passion Times publishes Hong Kong news and information across society, culture, arts, and radio programs.

Publication

Popular in Tech News

Well-known listings from the same topic.

All 77

Licensing is neither feasible nor effective for addressing AI risks FAQ

Who wrote this essay and when was it published?
Sayash Kapoor and Arvind Narayanan wrote it. The essay is dated June 10, 2023.
What position does the essay take on AI licensing?
It argues that licensing is neither feasible nor effective for addressing AI risks, and that non-proliferation would mainly benefit incumbent companies.
What cost estimate does the essay give for training an open-source model?
The authors estimate that Falcon, which required fewer than 400 GPUs and two months to train, can be trained for less than USD 1 million.
Is something wrong or out of date?

Tell us and an editor will check it.

Own this website?

Claim the listing and suggest updates yourself. An editor checks every claim first.

Claim this listing