On this page
Todoist vs Microsoft To Do at a glance #
| Factor | Todoist | Microsoft To Do |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Beginner | Free with a supported personal Microsoft account |
| Free project/list allowance | 5 personal projects | Lists without a separate premium allowance |
| Free attachments | 5 MB/file | 25 MB/task attachment |
| Paid plans | Pro for individuals; Business for teams | No separate To Do premium tier |
| Organization | Projects, sections, labels, priorities and filters | Lists, steps, importance and smart lists |
| Free views | List and board; 3 filter views | Lists, My Day, Planned and other smart lists |
| Calendar | Calendar layout is paid | Dated tasks appear in Planned; connected Outlook task workflow |
| Repetition | Natural-language rules, including completion-based intervals | Repeat presets and custom frequency |
| Integrations | Integration catalogue and developer API | Outlook and supported Microsoft accounts |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOS | Web, Windows, Mac, Android, iOS |
| Storage | Account-based cloud sync | Microsoft account/Exchange-based sync |
| Task data | Structured tasks with comments and attachments | Structured tasks with notes, steps and attachments |
| Open source | Proprietary service | Proprietary service |
| Maintenance | Current help and product updates | Current Microsoft support and app releases |
| Privacy decision | Your task data goes to the Todoist service | Your task data goes to the Microsoft account service |
The free allowances come from Todoist's plan table and Microsoft's task guidance. Both offer synchronized convenience, so neither fits a requirement to keep every task solely on your computer.
Project structure: Todoist handles work that crosses lists #
A simple list is enough until the same task needs several identities. “Send the revised contact-page mockup” belongs to a website project, but it might also be urgent and short enough to do between meetings. Todoist can hold the project while labels, priority and a filter give you other ways to find it.
I'd separate areas with projects and use sections for stages inside a project. You can then review a project as a list or board without copying tasks into a second system. The three free filters put a limit on how many custom cross-project views you can maintain, but they also encourage a compact setup.
Microsoft To Do's lists and task steps suit a shorter planning loop. A list called Website can hold the same action with a due date, importance and supporting steps. My Day brings selected work into a daily view, leaving the source list intact. You don't have to decide on a label vocabulary before recording a job.
The difference becomes clear during a weekly review. If you want one view of high-priority tasks across client projects, Todoist is the better fit. If you want to pick today's handful from a few lists, To Do has less to configure. More organization earns its place only when it helps you find the work.
Winner for cross-project organization: Todoist.
The daily plan: To Do makes a small commitment easy #
Microsoft describes My Day as the place to focus on the day's work. It starts fresh each day while the underlying tasks stay in their lists. That can help separate a large backlog from a realistic promise to yourself.
For a small website, today's plan might be three jobs: answer a support message, review one draft and fix a broken link. You can select those jobs without changing every due date to today. Actual deadlines still belong on the tasks that have them.
Todoist's Today view is a different starting point. It centers dated work, and priorities and filters can help refine what you see. If you already plan through due dates, this can feel more direct. If you assign a date to every hopeful task, the Today view can become an overfilled queue.
I'd choose the model that matches the way you make promises. My Day works for an intentional daily selection. Todoist works for a schedule you want to review and sort. Neither app decides whether twelve tasks fit into the two hours you actually have.
In both apps, keep deadlines meaningful. A review task without a deadline can wait in its project or list until you're ready. Turning every idea into overdue work makes the date less informative.
Winner for choosing a short daily focus list: Microsoft To Do.
Repeating work: Todoist offers more control over the next date #
Both apps can repeat a weekly website review. The interesting difference appears when the interval should start after completion, or when a task belongs on a specific working day of the month.
Todoist documents two recurrence styles: a fixed schedule and an interval based on completion. For example, every! 3 months schedules the next occurrence three months after you complete the current one. That fits a maintenance task whose next interval starts when the work was actually done.
Its documentation also supports phrases such as the last workday of the month. I'd pick Todoist if those rules are part of the reason you need an app. Reading the recognized date before saving still matters; a phrase that looks clear in a task name can have a specific meaning to the parser.
Microsoft To Do's Repeat control covers daily, weekdays, weekly, monthly, yearly and custom frequencies. That's fine for a weekly review or a daily check. Todoist's detailed recurring-date language gives it the edge for more varied scheduling.
Before moving a critical routine, make one harmless example and inspect the next date. An invoice check every Friday and a maintenance check seven days after completion express different promises. Choose the rule because it matches the job, not because it's the first option in the menu.
Winner for flexible repeat rules: Todoist.
Connections: choose the app closest to where tasks arrive #
The Todoist integration catalogue spans calendars, email, browsers, messaging and automation tools. A developer API gives a custom workflow another route in. I'd choose this flexibility when tasks arrive from several services and you want one destination.
Microsoft To Do wins a narrower but common situation: work that starts in Outlook. Microsoft's account documentation explains the supported account route. Keeping follow-ups close to email can remove a daily copying habit. Work-account access depends on the organization's supported setup.
For example, a support email should become one action with a link or connection to its context. You don't need a task containing the entire conversation if opening the source message gives you what you need. A separate project brief can stay in a note; the offline note-taking guide covers options for longer reference material.
I'd resist connecting every available service at once. First choose where new actions should land. Then connect the one source that currently causes forgotten work. A broad integration list is valuable when you have that need, but it also creates more places to check when a task doesn't arrive.
Winner for varied integrations: Todoist; for an Outlook-centered day: Microsoft To Do.
Cost: To Do asks less of a simple personal workflow #
Microsoft To Do has no separate paid task tier. If lists, steps, dates and reminders cover your needs, the choice doesn't become a subscription decision later. A personal Microsoft account is enough for the ordinary individual route.
Todoist Beginner can also cover everyday work, but five projects and three filters constrain a more elaborate system. Pro adds more capacity, a calendar layout and other advanced planning features. Business adds shared team administration. I'd upgrade only after identifying the free limit or feature that's stopping actual work.
The cost of switching deserves attention too. A task system contains routines and habits as well as data. If you make paid calendar planning central to your day, removing that feature later can mean rebuilding how you plan. Try your intended arrangement in the free plan before making that commitment.
For a shared team project with columns, comments and several collaborators, neither personal comparison should settle the entire decision. Trello or Asana may be a closer match. A stronger personal list doesn't automatically become the right place to manage a whole organization.
Winner for a simple workflow with no separate subscription: Microsoft To Do.
What users say #
Todoist's pricing discussion with its team brought out both loyalty to the app and frustration about changing costs. The team's replies explained the update; readers weighed that against the value of features they used. I'd pay attention to which part of your own system would disappear if you stayed free.
A 2026 Microsoft To Do discussion shows the other side of simplicity. Participants wanted richer tagging, more flexible repetition and a daily view that handled overdue work differently. One used Planned as an alternative to My Day. Those requests line up with a user who has outgrown plain lists.
Neither complaint changes my first recommendation for a beginner. Start with To Do for a short daily list, or Todoist for a system you already know needs cross-project views. The friction appears when you ask either app to behave like the other.
Choose Todoist if… #
- Tasks belong to several projects and need labels or priorities.
- You want custom views of work across projects.
- Repetition depends on completion dates or detailed date rules.
- Tasks arrive from a mix of email, calendars and other services.
- A paid plan would solve a specific, current planning need.
Choose Microsoft To Do if… #
- Your work fits into ordinary lists with a few steps per task.
- You want free reminders without choosing a premium tier.
- Outlook is already where follow-ups begin.
- You prefer selecting today's focus from a larger backlog.
- You'd rather spend little time configuring your task system.
Alternatives to both #
TickTick is worth considering when habits and focus tools belong beside tasks. Trello is better for a workflow explained by cards moving through columns. Notion fits tasks that need to sit beside project notes and reference pages.
For a project where the process itself is unclear, map it first with free flowchart tools. Choosing an app is easier once you know whether the work is a recurring checklist or a handoff between people.
FAQ #
Is Microsoft To Do better than Todoist?
Microsoft To Do is better for a simple free list routine, especially with Outlook. Todoist is better for projects, filters and detailed recurring dates. I'd choose by the work you need to organize today. Starting with a larger feature list can leave you maintaining a system that your actual tasks don't need.
Do both apps support reminders for free?
Yes. Microsoft's personal To Do app supports reminders, and Todoist's current Beginner plan lists task reminders. Todoist separates custom reminders into its paid offering. If reminders are the only reason you're considering a subscription, check the current free options first.
Can either app keep tasks entirely on my device?
Neither is designed as a fully local, account-free task manager. They synchronize through their respective cloud account services. If local files are a requirement, consider keeping a task checklist in a local notes system and weigh the loss of synchronized reminder features.
Which app is better for a team?
Todoist offers more project structure and a Business plan for team administration. Microsoft To Do can share lists but has a simpler task model. For work that needs dependencies, detailed reporting or multiple project views, compare dedicated project tools before committing your team to a personal-list app.
Related reading #
Best Free Task Management Apps for Personal Work and Small Teams, How to Set Recurring Tasks in Microsoft To Do, Todoist, Microsoft To Do, More options.
Sources #
- Todoist plans
- Todoist recurring dates
- Todoist integrations
- Microsoft To Do overview
- Microsoft due dates, reminders and repetition
Directory details
| Directory detail | Todoist | Microsoft To Do |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Todoist helps people and teams organize work and personal tasks in a shared to-do list. | Free task app from Microsoft with lists, reminders, recurring due dates, steps and Outlook integration. |
| Website | ||
| Type | Online tool | Online tool |
| Topic | ||
| Pricing | Not confirmed | Free |
| Platforms | Web | Android, iOS, mac, Web, Windows |
| Open source | Not stated | Not stated |
| Language | English | — |
| Alternatives | — |


