YOGA

YOGA Image Optimizer converts and optimizes JPEG, PNG, and WebP images.

yoga.flozz.org
YOGA homepage screenshot

About YOGA

YOGA Image Optimizer is a tool for converting and optimizing JPEG, PNG and WebP image files. Users drag and drop images, click "Optimize", and the tool re-encodes them to reduce file size. It is described on its homepage as free, and is offered as an installable application for Linux and Windows as well as a web version.

Key features

  • Drag-and-drop optimization of JPEG, PNG and WebP images
  • Converts JPEG to lossy WebP, which can halve file size
  • Converts PNG to lossless WebP, saving about 35% on average
  • Reports typical savings of about 30% for JPEG and over 20% for PNG
  • Available for Linux and Windows, and as a web tool
Best for: People who need to shrink JPEG, PNG or WebP files and want to try WebP conversion without installing specialized encoder tools.
Good for
  • Handles optimization and format conversion in one drag-and-drop workflow
  • States typical space savings for each supported input format
  • Offered on Linux, Windows and the web, and described as free
Watch out for
  • Optimization can be slow and RAM-intensive, especially for JPEGs
  • Only JPEG, PNG and WebP inputs are mentioned
  • Savings on WebP-to-WebP optimization are only a few percent

YOGA at a glance

Type
Online tool
Pricing
Not confirmed. Check the site
Platforms
Linux, Web, Windows
Open source
Not stated
Last checked
Oct 6, 2026 · Online when checked
Listed
Oct 5, 2026

YOGA alternatives

Tools and sites you could use instead, ranked by how closely they match.

All 11 alternatives

Convertmyimage

convert-my-image.com

Convert JPG, JPEG, and GIF images to PDF online, with options for batch image-to-PDF conversion.

Free

Popular in Image Tools

Well-known listings from the same topic.

All 174

YOGA FAQ

Which image formats does YOGA support?
It converts and optimizes JPEG, PNG and WebP files, and can convert JPEG and PNG input to WebP output.
How much space can optimization save?
The homepage states about 30% for JPEGs and more than 20% for PNGs; WebP-to-WebP optimization saves only a few percent, while converting JPEG to lossy WebP can halve the size and converting PNG to lossless WebP saves 35% on average.
Why can optimization be slow?
The JPEG encoder requires about 300 MB of RAM and roughly 3 minutes per megapixel; the PNG and WebP encoders are described as less resource hungry.
Is something wrong or out of date?

Tell us and an editor will check it.

Own this website?

Claim the listing and suggest updates yourself. An editor checks every claim first.

Claim this listing