This curated list helps readers get started with web archiving, with additional resources collected in the repository.
WikiTeam vs Httrack
How do WikiTeam and Httrack compare? Here are the facts side by side: pricing, platforms, open-source status and what each one is for.
| Directory detail | WikiTeam | Httrack |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | WikiTeam provides tools for archiving wikis, including MediaWiki sites, and reports preserving more than 600,000 wikis. | The official HTTrack repository contains source code for the website copier, which saves website content locally for offline use. |
| Website | ||
| Type | Open-source project | Open-source project |
| Topic | ||
| Pricing | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Platforms | Not recorded | Linux |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Language | English | English |
| Alternatives |
Other options to consider
Sites similar to both WikiTeam and Httrack.
This Node.js website downloader saves the source code and assets of a website, including JavaScript, stylesheets, and images.
ArchiveBox is self-hosted web archiving software that saves pages, browser history, bookmarks, PDFs, media, and related content.
waybackpack is a command-line tool for downloading the Wayback Machine archive associated with a given URL.
An archiving tool with an IM-style interface that prioritizes privacy and accessibility, integrated with various archival services including Internet Archive, archive.today, Ghostarchive, IPFS, Telegraph, and file systems.
SuckIT recursively downloads website content for offline navigation, with options for delays, multithreading, and saved crawl state.







